?

Log in

Another Stupid Live Journal (read it anyway)

Lynne Jamneck
Date: 2009-10-25 01:37
Subject: H.P. Lovecraft
Security: Public

Because I feel the man and his work deserves all the attention it can get.

“If we knew what we are, we should do as Sir Arthur Jermyn did; and Arthur Jermyn soaked himself in oil and set fire to his clothing one night.”

-- "Facts Concerning the Late Arthur Jermyn and His Family" 
 by H.P. Lovecraft
Post A Comment | Share | Link



Lynne Jamneck
Date: 2009-10-24 23:11
Subject: The Weight Of Paper And Ink
Security: Public

I usually try and not print out chunks of what I’ve written so as not to get bogged down in edits. But Jen has been asking to read what I have so far, so yesterday I printed out 20 000 of the 30 000 words I’ve got down for book one of the Strickland Diaries.

Strangely enough, I haven’t had the urge to go sit down and read it all. Apart from making note of a few things courtesy of some crits from a fellow scribbler (inspiring red underlines and circles) I don;t really feel the inclination to go and pour over it at all. Which is a good thing. Besides, I’m much to keen to figure out what happens next, and which characters jostling for attention will get the first say.

It must be said though – it feels good to hold 20 000 words in your hands.

If you missed it, Alex Strickland (of Strickland Diaries fame) has a Facebook profile

Post A Comment | Share | Link



Lynne Jamneck
Date: 2009-10-24 08:02
Subject: Saturday Night: Changes
Security: Public

Was going to see ‘Moon’, but a change of plans now has that happening tomorrow night. Snuggled in bed with cats and lovely. Tea next. Then some mindless TV.

Post A Comment | Share | Link



Lynne Jamneck
Date: 2009-10-24 06:39
Subject: Saturday Night Word:
Security: Public

collywobbles: intestinal cramps or other intestinal disturbances. (also known as tummy ache)

2 Comments | Post A Comment | Share | Link



Lynne Jamneck
Date: 2009-10-16 10:50
Subject: Stalking Daylight
Security: Public
Here's a spiffy update of the treatment-in-the-works myself and SF author Marianne de Pierres are writing for Enchanter Productions. Kick. Ass.


Stalking Daylight

2 Comments | Post A Comment | Share | Link






Lynne Jamneck
Date: 2009-10-13 20:44
Subject: Also, The Book Blog
Security: Public
I finally have the Wordpress blog set up dedicated entirely to the book I'm writing. You can find some interesting details about characters, guilds, soundtracks and more there, which will be updated frequently -

Strickland Diaries

Also, the protagonist, Alex Strickland has her own Facebook page:

Alex Strickland's Facebook Page


Post A Comment | Share | Link



Lynne Jamneck
Date: 2009-10-13 20:36
Subject: Protestant Guilt And Shifting Landscapes
Security: Public
Those are but two of the cool topics
I recently talked about the World SF Blog
in a short piece about the influence of
background and environment on writing.



1 Comment | Post A Comment | Share | Link



Lynne Jamneck
Date: 2009-10-09 14:02
Subject: (no subject)
Security: Public
Somehow the protag of my novel, Alex Strickland, got herself a profile on
Facebook.

This will be trouble.

http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000327533440&ref=name
Post A Comment | Share | Link



Lynne Jamneck
Date: 2009-09-25 14:34
Subject: Getting Ranty Pays Off
Security: Public
Sometimes it helps to go on TILT.

As noted in the rant-fest of an entry below this one... The day after said rant was posted, I emailed a very nice email to said lecturer explaining my position and why I thought certain of her comments had disadvantaged my grade. Result? Lecturer remarked essay and bumped grade from a B+ to an A-

Her email in response stating that she appreciated my commitment to the subject was nice. I had no intentions for feeling vindicated, just to make sense.

Original post at http://lynnejamneckdiaries.blogspot.com/

3 Comments | Post A Comment | Share | Link



Lynne Jamneck
Date: 2009-09-21 15:51
Subject: Learn To Recognise Good Data When You See It: A Rant In No Particular Parts
Security: Public
It's been hard at times, but for three years I've kept my mouth shut. About what, you ask? Well, most of the time Stephen King (because the man can be a joy to quote). But on the whole—genre fiction.
  • Context: University. Double major—English Literature and Religious Studies.

In three years, I have never raised contentions about either a grade I was given or the content of an essay. Until today. Today, while I tried not to froth at the mouth and head-butt the pillars of academia, I lost my pip. I lost it quietly, because I still had lectures to attend, but still enough to write down a mini rant. And I rarely rant. Today, then, must be a rare day.

  • Point of contention: Quoting Stephen King as an expert in the field of writing.

So I'm writing this nifty little essay for my Religious Studies paper "Myth And Ritual". In said paper, I propose to put forth the notion that the act of writing is a ritual comparable to that practised within ancient Shamanic traditions. I got all my quotes and lovelies for the shamanism theory down, no biggie. During the course of this little essay, I manage to quote both Clive Barker and Stephen King. [if you're curious, the quotes are: "I work to loud music—hard rock stuff like AC/DC… Metallica… but for me the music is just another way of shutting the door. It keeps the mundane world out.(KING); "I think novelists go out into a space that is essentially a psychic space… report back and say 'That's what I saw' (BARKER).

Notes in the margin, how we love them. So on the page where I offer up the quote from King, Mr Pet Cemetery's name is circled, and in the margin next to it, the following note: GOOD DATA ARE NEEDED.

Excuse me, what? That's funny. Because when I was writing this essay, I thought the best possible "data" you could get when it comes to what goes on during the creative writing process would be to quote a fucking best-selling writer. Now, it is interesting to notice that, on the very next page, Mr Clive has no angry circle around his name, and there is no mention of any GOOD DATA. Two things: 1)either the marker got sick of telling me to offer up GOOD DATA, or said marker didn’t recognise the name of Mr Clive, therefore having no clue that he wrote the same nonsensical, genre troll-trash as Mr King.

This is not the first time this issue has come up and I am sure you are all familiar with the biased opinions some academics hold against genre work. Yes, I know that in the academic field we like to have a nice theory from some third party who has, in numerous cases, never experienced exactly what it is they are theorising about. That's a good and a bad thing; good because it allows for a sense of distance and objectivity; bad because without experiencing something, really, can you ever know what the fuck you are talking about? Should academics not by now begin to realise that they can potentially benefit an enormous amount from people who are actually touching the very heart of what they themselves are working so hard at understanding?

I should perhaps mention that, said marker have on many an occasion displayed public disapproval verging on disrespect for Carl Jung's theories, many of which have an extremely close relationship to topics such as the imagination, the subconscious and the unconscious, human attributes that I believe are highly undervalued and underrated when it comes to understanding and interpreting not only literature, but us little Homo Sapiens as a whole. But then, those things are not concrete; they can't be put under a microscope and mapped, so fuck 'em. They mean nothing.

I'm not ranting because I want a better grade. But just once, I'd like you recognise that, when it comes to fiction--writing it, knowing it, living it, understanding it--Stephen King and any other seasoned writer has something valid to say. And you can take it as "data".

Final comments on the essay? "Some good insights here; best when substantiated with some data." I gave you data. You just blithely ignored and refused to see it because you allowed what you think you know about a "hack" to make you think you know better.

End note: Not all academics seem to live inside a sheltered box of theory. Earlier this year, a different Religious Studies lecturer in the same faculty admitted to me that genres such as science fiction may very well be better equipped to explain metaphysical notions about ourselves and the world. Aces.

Feel free to redistribute this link as well as the original post at http://lynnejamneckdiaries.blogspot.com/

4 Comments | Post A Comment | Share | Link






browse
my journal
links
March 2010